Call a spade a spade, don't call it a diet.
But that is exactly what Taco Bell has seemingly done with their new campaign the "Drive-Thru Diet". The worst part is, i'm sure it will work.....in selling more items for the chain. The bad news is, everyone knows that it won't work in reducing their waist lines but reading a success story and seeing someone that it worked for will impress upon a large portion of the population that this is a way to lose all that flab they have been carrying around. Unfortunately, fast food is one of the main causes of obesity in North America and telling people that they can lose weight by eating drive-thru is a terrible message. People will delude themselves into thinking that they can get one of these Taco Bell fresco items with a large pop and large fries then when they weight themselves in a month they will act shocked that they've in fact gained weight.
So much for corporate responsibility among major fast food chains.
If you really want to do something for the public and help encourage them to lose weight why don't you try this:
"Come into McDonald's and order your favourite meal, but instead of asking to super size it, ask us to slim size it to help your wallet and your waist."
The customer will receive a small fries and diet pop along with the option of making it a salad instead of fries. Also, the customer will receive a discount because their portion is smaller, and in this day and time a penny saved is a penny earned.
It won't make you those 50 extra cents that you make when people supersize but it will be received well by the public. If you are the first restaurant to pitch this idea I believe that you'll see a lot more customers turning up all of a sudden for lunch and dinner. You've just given them two reasons to! Save money and shave a little fat off your meal. Just watch Wendy's, A & W, and Jack in the Box follow suit.
Wednesday, January 20, 2010
Friday, January 15, 2010
Tourism touts star gazing
Back in the good old days your family would all pack into your station wagon/mini van/camper truck and take a trip out into the woods for some camping. Inevitably when you were bored at night without TV to keep you company you would look up to the heavens and see all the twinkling stars. At that point your father would most likely attempt to act like he knew which one the big dipper was and you didn't have the knowledge to question his random finger pointing.
Well it seems that provinces and states are using a different kind of star gazing to try and attract tourists nowadays.
Today the province of British Columbia unveiled their new Tourism BC 30 second ad and it appears they are stealing a page out of the guvernator's book by flashing celebrities of BC heritage at people.
Now fortunately British Columbia is in fact one of the most beautiful places on earth and some of the footage they use in the commercial shows this natural beauty off quite well. The question is, does the fact that famous people come from BC have any relevance on making people travel to my wonderful province. Now, the current generation of people are certainly celeb-obsessed and maybe the appearance of some well known stars will help to peak this younger generations interest in the west coast, but I wonder if it could have been made just as effective by having real people that experienced it for the first time explaining what BC was like to them. I'm sure you could have found plenty of tourists that would say nice things about the province. I think the ad will be very successful anyways because it is done quite tastefully and shows off a little portion of what BC has to offer.
Anyways, here is the California video, which clearly was successful because it ran for a long time and a second version of it came out after the first to build on the success of the initial launch.
Arnold Schwarzenegger's acting ability still awes me to this day. He just hits his line with such poise and natural talent. I mean, without him movies like Twins and Commando wouldn't have been such instant classics.
So what will BC follow California into next, maybe this.
Well it seems that provinces and states are using a different kind of star gazing to try and attract tourists nowadays.
Today the province of British Columbia unveiled their new Tourism BC 30 second ad and it appears they are stealing a page out of the guvernator's book by flashing celebrities of BC heritage at people.
Now fortunately British Columbia is in fact one of the most beautiful places on earth and some of the footage they use in the commercial shows this natural beauty off quite well. The question is, does the fact that famous people come from BC have any relevance on making people travel to my wonderful province. Now, the current generation of people are certainly celeb-obsessed and maybe the appearance of some well known stars will help to peak this younger generations interest in the west coast, but I wonder if it could have been made just as effective by having real people that experienced it for the first time explaining what BC was like to them. I'm sure you could have found plenty of tourists that would say nice things about the province. I think the ad will be very successful anyways because it is done quite tastefully and shows off a little portion of what BC has to offer.
Anyways, here is the California video, which clearly was successful because it ran for a long time and a second version of it came out after the first to build on the success of the initial launch.
Arnold Schwarzenegger's acting ability still awes me to this day. He just hits his line with such poise and natural talent. I mean, without him movies like Twins and Commando wouldn't have been such instant classics.
So what will BC follow California into next, maybe this.
Wednesday, December 16, 2009
Delivering Trouble
Purolator is the company that was awarded the Vancouver 2010 Olympics contract to deliver tickets purchased to events. A pretty nice sized contract which gets them a huge amount of exposure (not that they needed it) to people in all works of life. Owners, employees, and every other type of person who no doubt will have something shipped at some point in their life. Now, i'm not saying that if every person had a good experience with Purolator they would all only use this company in the future for their shipping needs.
It's more the opposite side of the coin, i'm guessing anyone that has a negative experience with the process will be extremely unlikely to use Purolator in the future if given a choice. And, from what i've heard so far, there is a lot of negativity around the process. Purolator doesn't seem to have nailed the logistical aspect of this major project. The tickets were put in people's names and the majority marked down their home address to have the tickets delivered to - Purolator delivers during the day, when the majority of these people are at work and therefore not at their home address. People then have to make their way to Purolator's shipping centres to pick up the tickets that they missed delivery of, and you have to have something that matches your name to the address on the tickets (many people will have moved). You have a time limit of 6 days before the tickets are shipped back to VANOC at which point you are unable to collect and will no doubt have to undergo the process all over again.
These time limits and Purolator's hours have led to large lineups at their shipping centres and angry customers who have been turned away because their stores stop serving people at exactly their close time. People are also arriving at the stores and finding that they put down a different address than where they currently live and don't have the proper documents to pick up the tickets. They are being turned away.
Here's a couple of ideas Purolator:
1. Extend you hours slightly so people getting off work have more chance to make it to your store. 7pm is too early a closing time.
2. Write on the little note you leave saying "Sorry we missed you" that people need to ensure they have something that proves they live at the address listed on the tickets.
3. Have more people working on weekends so that your customers can get through the lineups in a somewhat reasonable timeframe.
Winning a big contract is one thing but having the foresight to see the exposure you get as a result is another. Make sure you are prepared to do the job when you are going out to thousands and thousands of potential customers.
It's more the opposite side of the coin, i'm guessing anyone that has a negative experience with the process will be extremely unlikely to use Purolator in the future if given a choice. And, from what i've heard so far, there is a lot of negativity around the process. Purolator doesn't seem to have nailed the logistical aspect of this major project. The tickets were put in people's names and the majority marked down their home address to have the tickets delivered to - Purolator delivers during the day, when the majority of these people are at work and therefore not at their home address. People then have to make their way to Purolator's shipping centres to pick up the tickets that they missed delivery of, and you have to have something that matches your name to the address on the tickets (many people will have moved). You have a time limit of 6 days before the tickets are shipped back to VANOC at which point you are unable to collect and will no doubt have to undergo the process all over again.
These time limits and Purolator's hours have led to large lineups at their shipping centres and angry customers who have been turned away because their stores stop serving people at exactly their close time. People are also arriving at the stores and finding that they put down a different address than where they currently live and don't have the proper documents to pick up the tickets. They are being turned away.
Here's a couple of ideas Purolator:
1. Extend you hours slightly so people getting off work have more chance to make it to your store. 7pm is too early a closing time.
2. Write on the little note you leave saying "Sorry we missed you" that people need to ensure they have something that proves they live at the address listed on the tickets.
3. Have more people working on weekends so that your customers can get through the lineups in a somewhat reasonable timeframe.
Winning a big contract is one thing but having the foresight to see the exposure you get as a result is another. Make sure you are prepared to do the job when you are going out to thousands and thousands of potential customers.
Boxing Day....Month??? Year?????
I remember the good old days, when Boxing Day in Canada meant companies heavily discounting prices on all the crappy products that they were trying to get rid of all year but just couldn't. Cue the red tag, red pen, or any other type of redness that can be used to demonstrate a slashing of prices. What? You mean our 8-track/vinyl/cd player all in one didn't move? Mark it down 75 percent and call it a doorcrasher. Then shmucks would line up at the door starting early in the morning and make a run for that 8-track/vinyl/cd 3-in-1 combo they had their eyes on for the last 2 days when the flyer was delivered to their home. I had the pleasure of working in a retail environment on a number of boxing days, that is neither here nor there so i'll save those stories for another time.
What unfortunately has happened with boxing day is companies have captured consumers attention and wallets on that specific day and are now trying to bottle it up and unleash it for longer and longer and now are starting earlier and earlier. Therefore they will eventually erode all the hard work that Boxing Day put into building itself up to being the ultimate shopping day of the year. Now maybe this works better for retailers because they get a longer length of increased sales from customers looking for deals during "Boxing Week" but when you start advertising "Pre-Boxing Day Sales", well, your customers will catch on eventually.
People will either start holding back all their major purchases till "Boxing Month" or they will realize that not everything can be discounted all the time and will theorize that maybe your margins are a little too high and future advertising for boxing day sales will be completely lost in the clutter of regular flyers and regular advertising.
Either way it will be interesting to see how far in front of and behind the 26th of December retailers can move. I look forward to when Boxing Day sales outpace the first Christmas commercial of the year which usually comes around about September 1st.
What unfortunately has happened with boxing day is companies have captured consumers attention and wallets on that specific day and are now trying to bottle it up and unleash it for longer and longer and now are starting earlier and earlier. Therefore they will eventually erode all the hard work that Boxing Day put into building itself up to being the ultimate shopping day of the year. Now maybe this works better for retailers because they get a longer length of increased sales from customers looking for deals during "Boxing Week" but when you start advertising "Pre-Boxing Day Sales", well, your customers will catch on eventually.
People will either start holding back all their major purchases till "Boxing Month" or they will realize that not everything can be discounted all the time and will theorize that maybe your margins are a little too high and future advertising for boxing day sales will be completely lost in the clutter of regular flyers and regular advertising.
Either way it will be interesting to see how far in front of and behind the 26th of December retailers can move. I look forward to when Boxing Day sales outpace the first Christmas commercial of the year which usually comes around about September 1st.
Tuesday, December 15, 2009
Overpromise & Underdeliver
That seems to be the mantra of General Motors. They just don't get it.
I've written in the past multiple times about how frustrating GM is to deal with and how they are clearly one of the worst run car companies in the world. But they just leave themselves so open to criticism with their practices it's embarassing.
How long have they been touting their electric car The Volt for? Years and years. The car looks great and is forward thinking......or at least it was back in 2005 or whenever they first launched it. That was cutting edge and they surprised people with the look of it then. As Andy Nulman constantly writes about on his POW! blog using the art of surprise is a great marketing tactic. Unfortunately GM couldn't back up their surprise anytime soon and now everytime the word Volt is used in conversation it is met with a snear.
....and then you get this from Nissan
I didn't even know Nissan was working on an electric vehicle (one however, would assume most smart car companies are working on an electric vehicle)! So what do they do, they role out a model and show it actually being used in the world. Wow! Surprise and the novel concept of showing the car exists and can-in-fact function in the real world. Not just concepts or dreams or figments of someones imagination. A real live test model.
Thumbs up Nissan, and yet another loss for GM. Your culture of losing is getting well established at this point General Motors.
I've written in the past multiple times about how frustrating GM is to deal with and how they are clearly one of the worst run car companies in the world. But they just leave themselves so open to criticism with their practices it's embarassing.
How long have they been touting their electric car The Volt for? Years and years. The car looks great and is forward thinking......or at least it was back in 2005 or whenever they first launched it. That was cutting edge and they surprised people with the look of it then. As Andy Nulman constantly writes about on his POW! blog using the art of surprise is a great marketing tactic. Unfortunately GM couldn't back up their surprise anytime soon and now everytime the word Volt is used in conversation it is met with a snear.
....and then you get this from Nissan
I didn't even know Nissan was working on an electric vehicle (one however, would assume most smart car companies are working on an electric vehicle)! So what do they do, they role out a model and show it actually being used in the world. Wow! Surprise and the novel concept of showing the car exists and can-in-fact function in the real world. Not just concepts or dreams or figments of someones imagination. A real live test model.
Thumbs up Nissan, and yet another loss for GM. Your culture of losing is getting well established at this point General Motors.
Thursday, November 19, 2009
ABC
Forgot to include this with the last post I made. Amazing monologue by Alec Baldwin that i'm sure most salesman have seen.
What will our generation's Glengarry Glen Ross a-typical salesperson look/act like?
What will our generation's Glengarry Glen Ross a-typical salesperson look/act like?
Wednesday, November 18, 2009
Will salesmen Always Be Closing?
I finished reading Chris Anderson's Free a few weeks back and although the book wasn't quite as great a read as I was hoping for it did the job of making my brain whirr away with thoughts and started me thinking on many spinoffs of "Free".
One of the chief thoughts that has been swirling around in my head over the last little while is "What does the future hold for salespeople?"
This thought has been percolating because as is noted in the book, there are so many sources of free information these days and this dearth of info is only getting larger and larger as the internet continues to increase in popularity and more and more people have access to it. You combine that with a younger generation that grows up online reading forums, wikis, and interacting with discussion groups and online friends and you start to see why salesperson could be an interesting occupation to watch the development of down the road. What is a salesperson possibly going to tell people that they haven't already been able to find out on their own or from someone else online?
I, in fact, am a perfect example of this. If i'm looking for something specifically the first thing I will do is go online to try to find it. I'll check out specs, prices, and shop around. One such purchase I made recently was a portable sound dock for an ipod player. I search Future Shop, Best Buy, and London Drugs' websites comparing prices and features, reading the odd review that I could find on products that matched my needs. Once I had finished this part of the purchase cycle, I merely walked into the store, grabbed the product and marched up to the counter. In and out in 2 minutes.
But electronic retail stores aren't the only example of a possible death of the salesman. On the evening news last night they ran a story on how more and more people are using online stock trading tools to do their trading for them instead of using a stock broker. Will this effect the industry? I should think so. Granted stock traders provide a lot more value than people probably give them credit for as they research deep into potential companies to invest in, talk to the owners, and provide personalized recommendations to match your investing style. But more and more people are going to be doing their own research and using eTrade or another online brokerage to make their trades. Some people may not have much luck using this method and therefore end up back in the arms of an awaiting broker, but those that do have success could greatly influence the movement of the stock market as opposed to the traditional powers of brokerages to provide upward and downward momentum on specific stocks based on what they put their word/clients into. Somewhere down the road instead of seeing "Cannacord Capital forecasts targets of $30.00 per share for so and so corp" you may see "Facebook member ChunkyMonkey53 forecasts an increase of $1 per share by the end of the year according to their status update".
At the same time, if you've ever been on the BullBoards on Stockhouse you will realize how much crap there is out there and how it can be tough to trust the majority of information you read on some of these sites. Hence the role of a broker to de-crapify this information and make sure you get the appropriate facts you need.
Recently I even purchased a pre-sale condominium and to be honest, aside from writing up the contract, I'm not sure what the salesperson did to sell me. I found out all the information online, I looked through their display suite on my own, I talked to the bank on my own. So how much value are they really providing to be getting a major cut of the money that the company is getting off me.
Well now that this is seemingly spinning into a rant i'll close off here. My brother is a salesperson, and i've been a salesperson in the past, but I don't know if I would encourage my children to get into the profession in the future. It could be one of those things a few generations down the road that our great grandchildren miss out on, just like stamps, home phones, and paperback books.
One of the chief thoughts that has been swirling around in my head over the last little while is "What does the future hold for salespeople?"
This thought has been percolating because as is noted in the book, there are so many sources of free information these days and this dearth of info is only getting larger and larger as the internet continues to increase in popularity and more and more people have access to it. You combine that with a younger generation that grows up online reading forums, wikis, and interacting with discussion groups and online friends and you start to see why salesperson could be an interesting occupation to watch the development of down the road. What is a salesperson possibly going to tell people that they haven't already been able to find out on their own or from someone else online?
I, in fact, am a perfect example of this. If i'm looking for something specifically the first thing I will do is go online to try to find it. I'll check out specs, prices, and shop around. One such purchase I made recently was a portable sound dock for an ipod player. I search Future Shop, Best Buy, and London Drugs' websites comparing prices and features, reading the odd review that I could find on products that matched my needs. Once I had finished this part of the purchase cycle, I merely walked into the store, grabbed the product and marched up to the counter. In and out in 2 minutes.
But electronic retail stores aren't the only example of a possible death of the salesman. On the evening news last night they ran a story on how more and more people are using online stock trading tools to do their trading for them instead of using a stock broker. Will this effect the industry? I should think so. Granted stock traders provide a lot more value than people probably give them credit for as they research deep into potential companies to invest in, talk to the owners, and provide personalized recommendations to match your investing style. But more and more people are going to be doing their own research and using eTrade or another online brokerage to make their trades. Some people may not have much luck using this method and therefore end up back in the arms of an awaiting broker, but those that do have success could greatly influence the movement of the stock market as opposed to the traditional powers of brokerages to provide upward and downward momentum on specific stocks based on what they put their word/clients into. Somewhere down the road instead of seeing "Cannacord Capital forecasts targets of $30.00 per share for so and so corp" you may see "Facebook member ChunkyMonkey53 forecasts an increase of $1 per share by the end of the year according to their status update".
At the same time, if you've ever been on the BullBoards on Stockhouse you will realize how much crap there is out there and how it can be tough to trust the majority of information you read on some of these sites. Hence the role of a broker to de-crapify this information and make sure you get the appropriate facts you need.
Recently I even purchased a pre-sale condominium and to be honest, aside from writing up the contract, I'm not sure what the salesperson did to sell me. I found out all the information online, I looked through their display suite on my own, I talked to the bank on my own. So how much value are they really providing to be getting a major cut of the money that the company is getting off me.
Well now that this is seemingly spinning into a rant i'll close off here. My brother is a salesperson, and i've been a salesperson in the past, but I don't know if I would encourage my children to get into the profession in the future. It could be one of those things a few generations down the road that our great grandchildren miss out on, just like stamps, home phones, and paperback books.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Posts
